Leadership Styles and Strategic Decision-Making: An Analytical Study of Transformational Leadership and Organizational Effectiveness
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research constructs a coherent theoretical framework relating to the impact of transformational leadership on the quality of strategic decision-making and, consequently, the performance of the organization, as well as further implications on accounting guidance and financial regulation. The research is a synthesis of findings based on the insights of the leading psychology, decision science, and accounting theory, using a non-empirical analytical design methodology based on theoretical evaluation and deductive reasoning. The model determines three pathways that relate to one another, namely cognitive, motivational, and structural, in which transformational leadership strengthens analytical reasoning, ethical judgment, participatory decision behavior, and compatibility between decisions and organizational goals. One of the important contributions of this study is that the quality of decision-making has been revealed as the main mediation variable between the leadership behavior and organizational as well as accounting outcomes. The framework uses accounting-specific views to describe how transformational leadership can affect key processes in the audit judgment, financial reporting decision, risk assessment, and internal control evaluation. This addition fills a significant gap in the theoretical knowledge by identifying leadership as a predictor of the level of accounting judgment and governance. Though the framework is conceptual in nature, it offers a basis on which empirical studies of leadership effects in accounting cases can be conducted in the future and has practical implications for the improvement of financial reporting reliability and organizational accountability by building leadership.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Northouse PG. Leadership: Theory and Practice. 9th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2022.
[2] Antonakis J, Day DV, editors. The nature of leadership. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2017.
[3] Crockett JB, Billingsley BS, Boscardin ML, editors. Handbook of leadership and administration for special education. New York: Routledge; 2012.
[4] Dinh JE, Lord RG, Gardner WL, Meuser JD, Liden RC, Hu J. Leadership theory and research in the new millennium. Leadersh Q. 2014;25(1):36–62.
[5] Burns JM. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row; 1978.
[6] Bass BM. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press; 1985.
[7] Breevaart K, Bakker AB, Hetland J, Demerouti E, Olsen OK, Espevik R. Daily transactional and transformational leadership and daily employee engagement. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2014;87(1):138–57.
[8] Wang G, Oh IS, Courtright SH, Colbert AE. Transformational leadership and performance: A meta-analysis. J Manage. 2011;36(5):1228–61.
[9] Riesenmy KR. The moderating role of follower identification in the relationship between leader and follower visionary leadership. Emerg Leadersh J. 2008;1(2):62–77.
[10] Raveendran T. Impact of transformational leadership on employee performance with the mediation impact of employee engagement. 2022.
[11] Eisenhardt KM, Zbaracki MJ. Strategic decision making. Strateg Manage J. 1992;13(S2):17–37.
[12] Dean JW, Sharfman MP. Does decision process matter? Acad Manage J. 1996;39(2):368–96.
[13] Hannah ST, Uhl-Bien M, Avolio BJ, Cavarretta F. A framework for examining leadership in extreme contexts. Leadersh Q. 2014;25(6):898–921.
[14] Kahneman D, Klein G. Conditions for intuitive expertise. Am Psychol. 2009;64(6):515–26.
[15] Hodgkinson GP, Healey MP. Psychological foundations of strategic management. Strateg Manage J. 2011;32(13):1500–16.
[16] Richard PJ, Devinney TM, Yip GS, Johnson G. Measuring organizational performance. J Manage. 2009;35(3):718–804.
[17] Hurduzeu RE. The impact of leadership on organizational performance. SEA Pract Appl Sci. 2015;3(7):289–93.
[18] Bennett N, Lemoine GJ. What VUCA really means for you. Harv Bus Rev. 2014;92(1–2):27–42.
[19] Bass BM, Avolio BJ. Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.
[20] Eisenbeiss SA, Van Knippenberg D, Boerner S. Transformational leadership and team innovation: Integrating team climate principles. J Appl Psychol. 2008;93(6):1438–46.
[21] García-Morales VJ, Jiménez-Barrionuevo MM, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez L. Transformational leadership, organizational learning, and innovation. J Bus Res. 2012;65(7):1040–50.
[22] Gong Y, Huang JC, Farh JL. Employee learning orientation and performance. Acad Manage J. 2009;52(4):765–78.
[23] Groen BA, Wouters MJ, Wilderom CP. Why do employees take more initiatives after co-developing performance measures? Manage Account Res. 2012;23(2):120–41.
[24] Yukl G. Leadership in organizations. 8th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson; 2013.
[25] Judge TA, Piccolo RF. Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89(5):755–68.
[26] Piccolo RF, Colquitt JA. Transformational leadership and job behaviors. Acad Manage J. 2006;49(2):327–40.
[27] Daft RL. Organization theory and design. 13th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning; 2021.
[28] Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Moorman RH, Fetter R. Transformational leader behaviors and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadersh Q. 1990;1(2):107–42.
[29] Avolio BJ, Yammarino FJ. Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead. Bingley: Emerald Group; 2013.
[30] Boerner S, Eisenbeiss SA, Griesser D. Follower behavior and organizational performance. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2007;13(3):15–26.
[31] Elbanna S, Child J. The influence of decision, environmental and firm characteristics on the rationality of strategic decision-making. J Manage Stud. 2007;44(4):561–91.
[32] Papadakis VM, Barwise P. How much do CEOs and top managers matter? Br J Manage. 2002;13(1):83–95.
[33] Hitt MA, Ireland RD, Hoskisson RE. Strategic management: Competitiveness and globalization. Mason: Cengage; 2007.
[34] Whetten DA. An examination of the interface between context and theory. J Manage. 2009;35(5):1238–50.